| 
     | 
     | 
    
      
          | 
       
      
         | 
       
      
        | Report on proceedings | 
       
      
        Some of the best brains
        in the field of air quality management from across the world met in an international
        workshop organised by Centre for Science and Environment in Delhi to develop two tools of
        critical importance in air quality management.  | 
          | 
       
      
        The exercise of
        developing methodologies for building two basic tools of air quality management for Delhi
        an air quality index and an emission inventory was launched at an international workshop,
        in the capital recently. The workshop was attended by experts from the US, Sweden, India,
        Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nepal. The Indian participants included representatives from
        Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), Delhi Pollution Control Board (DPCC), National
        Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI), Indian Institute of Petroleum (IIP),
        Automotive Research Association of India (ARAI) and Indian Institute of Technology (IIT),
        Delhi. Three days of hard deliberations produced a blue print for future actions.  | 
       
      
         | 
       
      
        
          
              | 
            In 1997,
            Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), New Delhi, had published a study which showed
            that one person dies every hour in Delhi due to air pollution. But, despite the warning
            and worsening air pollution levels, no action has yet been taken by the Government to
            inform the public of the daily levels of pollution and how they affect their health. No
            one can say anything with certainty about the sources of the deadly cocktail of pollutants
            and how much of these pollutants these sources spew out in the air. In view of its
            extended campaign for Right to Clean Air, CSE decided to take the initiative
            to assess the ambient air quality through an AQI and the emission levels through an
            emission inventory.  
                | 
           
         
         | 
       
      
         | 
       
      
        The Challenges 
        An AQI is used to inform the public of the daily air pollution levels and their effects on
        the health of different groups of people like asthmatics, children, elderly and also to
        healthy. However, developing an air quality index for Delhi presented unique problems. It
        could not just adopt any model being used other countries.  
         
        The first step in developing an AQI is to identify the various problem pollutants and to
        decide how to convey to the public the various effects the different levels pollutants
        have on their health. But Delhi has the unique problem of a number of pollutants shooting
        high above the permissible limit on any given day. The question that loomed large was how
        to capture the health effects of the high levels of the mixture of these pollutants.  | 
       
      
         | 
       
      
        Which pollutants
        should be monitored? 
        Only three pollutants are monitored regularly at all sites in Delhi sulphur dioxide,
        nitrogen dioxide and suspended particulate matter. The experts, however, made it clear
        that an AQI should be able to capture the health risk from pollution levels
        comprehensively and for that the range of pollutants monitored be increased to include
        pollutants like carbon monoxide, ozone and PM10. They also pointed out that the levels of
        all pollutants should be reported to the public daily.  | 
       
      
         | 
       
      
        What about toxic air
        pollutants? 
        Another question, hotly debated during the discussions was whether to include toxic air
        pollutants like benzene in the AQI. It is now well known that concentration of benzene, a
        known carcinogen, in Delhis air is extremely high. However, the experts suggested
        that a cancer risk map of Delhi should be prepared based on the annual average
        concentration of benzene, rather than announcing its daily levels, as according to the
        World Health Organisation there is no level below which it can be considered safe.  | 
       
      
         | 
       
      
        
          
            AQI:
            what and how much? 
            As the content of AQI notification is crucial to the success of the system, the question
            that what message to convey to the public and how to categorise the air quality so that it
            reflects adequately the level of air pollution in simplest terms emerged as a critical
            issue. The experts explained that since protection of public health is the main aim of
            developing an AQI, it should be able to clearly spell out which group of the population is
            at risk from which pollutant. Arden Pope, Professor at Brigham Young University pointed
            out that it is not enough to tell people whether the quality of the air they are breathing
            is good or bad. According to him majority of the people affected by bad air do not
            understand the health implications. Therefore it should be the primary aim of the AQI to
            tell them about it.  | 
              | 
           
         
         | 
       
      
        Notably, the experts found
        that if the AQI of USA, which has six descriptor categories, explaining the corresponding
        health effects, is applied to the pollution levels of Delhi, most of the days will turn
        out to be of unhealthy air quality, if not worse. Thus, they felt it is more important to
        capture the health effects at various levels of pollution exceeding the permissible limit
        rather than focussing on the levels below the limit. Therefore, they recommended that the
        AQI should have 5 categories, of which 2 categories should be below and 3 above the
        standards and that the descriptors to be used for these categories should be health-based
        like good, unhealthy, very unhealthy and critical.  | 
       
      
         | 
       
      
        What purpose will an
        AQI serve? 
        However, besides serving advisory purpose for the public, the workshop also pointed out
        that AQI could also serve as a tool for two major purposes. First, to educate people and
        galvanise them in to action. Experience in Western countries has shown that once people
        are made aware of the severity of the problem, they take up the initiative by putting
        pressure on politicians and administrators to bring down the emissions and to make policy
        level changes. Second, it can be used as a yardstick to declare pollution emergency.
        Experts like Kirk Smith, Professor of Environmental Health Sciences at University of
        California, Berkeley, and Shankar Prasad, Community Health Advisor to the Chairman of
        California Air Resources Board, arguing strongly in favour of having pollution emergency
        measures pointed out that emergency measures should be on two levels voluntary and
        mandatory. However, the levels at which pollution emergency should be declared and what
        the measures should be was left open to be discussed and developed. 
         
        But is an AQI enough to capture the risk air pollution poses to the health of people? Some
        of the experts thought otherwise. Therefore, in addition to the AQI they came up with
        another kind of index which can capture the long-term health effects of both criteria and
        toxic air pollutants. To deal with these chronic effects, the group suggested to create a
        Chronic Pollutants Index (CPI).  | 
       
      
         | 
       
      
        Where do all these
        pollutants come from? 
        But it is not enough only to know about the daily or monthly levels of pollution. For any
        air pollution control policy to be effective it is absolutely essential to know where
        these pollutants come from. This needs a detailed listing the various sources of air
        pollution and the emissions from them in a given time frame, for instance, a month or a
        year. This is what an emission inventory does. It is relatively easy to identify the
        sources of pollutants, but the most important part is to know which source is contributing
        how much of a particular pollutant. Only then can one formulate an action plan to control
        the emission of that pollutant.  | 
       
      
         | 
       
      
        What is the way
        ahead? 
        During the discussions, it became clear that the whole exercise needed to be started from
        scratch. But what does that mean in Delhis context? According to Linda Murchisson,
        chief of the emission inventory branch, California Air Resources Board, preparing an
        emission inventory is a step by step process.0 It involves identification of the sources
        of pollution and the pollutants of concern, their distribution and trend in emission and
        then identify and track if existing control policies are effective in controlling
        pollution.  | 
       
      
         | 
       
      
        
          
              | 
            How to
            develop an emission inventory? 
            There are well-established methods across the world to prepare an inventory. The US, which
            started the air quality monitoring and inventorisation exercise from the 1970s, has
            developed a system of tracking the changes in the rate of emissions from different sources
            through photochemical modelling of air quality and trends. But that is not possible in the
            Indian scenario without first putting a basic source apportionment exercise in place. The
            European Union has developed a method using satellite imagery to identify land use
            sectors. This information along with other data can be used to allocate emissions within a
            geographic area. This method has been used extensively in Europe and is relatively
            inexpensive.  | 
           
         
         | 
       
      
         | 
       
      
        However, preparing such an
        inventory for Delhi will be highly resource intensive. Therefore, the expert group felt
        the best way would be to have two approaches  long-term and short-term. While the
        short-term exercise will be to develop a preliminary inventory in one to two years
        time by way of doing rapid survey and using existing emission factors for calculating
        emissions, the long-term exercise should be very detailed and can take 5 to 10 years.  
         
        In absence of credible emissions data for Delhi, it is not possible to use sophisticated
        models currently being used in the US and Europe. Therefore, a comprehensive pollution
        inventory exercise for Delhi has to begin with the conventional bottom-up approach, that
        is survey and actual measurement of emissions. Without actually doing emissions
        measurement from various sources, it is not possible to find out how much different
        sources contribute to the total pollution load.  
         
        However, to help prioritise this exercise, satellite based emission estimates could be of
        great help, the experts pointed out. Such an exercise, which is a short-term activity, has
        the potential of pointing out the rate of emissions from different sources.  | 
       
      
         | 
       
      
        | Attendees | 
       
      
         | 
       
      
        | Air Quality Index | 
       
      
        
          
            | 1. | 
            Joseph Cassmassi, Senior meteorologist, South Coast Air
            Quality Management District | 
           
          
            | 2. | 
            Dr Shankar Prasad, Community Health Advisor to the Chairman
            California air resources board | 
           
          
            | 3. | 
            Dr Arden Pope Professor, Department of Economics, Brigham
            YoungUniversity | 
           
          
            | 4. | 
            Susan Lyon Stone, Environmental Health Scientist, Health and
            Ecosystem Effects Group: US EPA | 
           
          
            | 5. | 
            Dr. Michael Kleinman, Professor, Air Pollution Health
            Effects Laboratory, University of California | 
           
          
            | 6. | 
            James W. Yarbrough, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency | 
           
          
            | 7. | 
            Mr Edward L. Michel, Texas Natural Resource Conservation
            Commission | 
           
          
            | 8. | 
            Mathew Abraham, Indian Institute o1.f Petroleum,
              Dehradun. | 
           
          
            | 9. | 
            Dr B Sengupta, Member Secretary, C2.entral Pollution Control
            Board | 
           
          
            | 10. | 
            Pawan Kumar, Scientist, EIA Division3., NEERI, Nehru Marg | 
           
          
            | 11. | 
            Dr Mukesh Sharma, IIT Kanpur 4. | 
           
          
            | 12. | 
            Prof. Kirk R Smith, Department of En5.vironmental Health
            Sciences, University of California | 
           
          
            | 13. | 
            Promila Goyal, Centre for Atmospheri6.c Sciences, IIT Delhi | 
           
          
            | 14. | 
            K Srinivas, Automotive Research Ass7.ociation of India,
            Emission Certification Laboratory | 
           
         
         | 
       
      
         | 
       
      
        | Emission Inventory and Air Quality
        Monitoring | 
       
      
        
          
            | 1. | 
            Linda Murchisson Ph.D., Branch Chief, California Air
            Resources Board, | 
           
          
            | 2. | 
            Michael Walsh , International Consultant, Arlington, USA | 
           
          
            | 3. | 
            Dr Viney P Aneja, Research Professor, Department of Marine
            Earth and Atmosphere Sciences, North Carolina State University | 
           
          
            | 4. | 
            Peter Ahlvik, Ecotraffic, ERD AB, Sweden | 
           
          
            | 5. | 
            Eric Fujita Ph.D., Professor, Energy and Environmental
            Engineering Centre, Desert Research Institute | 
           
          
            | 6. | 
            H B Mathur, Professor Emeritus, Delhi College of Engineering | 
           
          
            | 7. | 
            Åke Iverfeldt, IVL (Swedish Environmental Research
            Institute Ltd.), Sweden | 
           
          
            | 8. | 
            Lennart Erlandsson, MTC AB, Department Air Quality 
            Structural Projects, Sweden | 
           
         
         | 
       
      
         | 
       
      
        Why did
        we do this workshop? 
         
        Despite advances in the scale and scope of urban air quality monitoring in recent years
        major difficulties persists in getting comprehensive and reliable air quality data in the
        Indian cities. Monitoring capability is so weak that routine information on all key
        pollutants is not available to provide a reasonably complete picture of the air quality
        trends and assess source wise trends in the city. There is need for a system that would
        take comprehensive stock of air pollution in cities, warn people on a daily basis about
        the risk, and set future targets for air quality with steady improvements over time. At
        the moment we are unable to assess properly. 
         
          1.  what are the serious and growing air pollutants in a city;  
        2.  the contribution of different sources to these pollutants and whether or at what
        speed these sources are growing; and  
        3.  risk to public health from peak levels on a daily basis. 
           
        Nor can we develop pollutant wise action plans for each pollution source for an effective
        impact. Therefore, the workshop will address the following:  | 
       
      
        1. 
          Develop Air
        Quality index for the city of Delhi  
        The public is not fully aware of the dangers that it faces on a regular basis. We would
        like to develop an appropriate index that helps the public to know very clearly what are
        the problems on a daily basis in a very simple way. As of now we are not sure what kind of
        index would capture the risk from urban air pollution in a city like Delhi where a number
        of gases are simultaneously going above the standards. A day when several gases are above
        the standard is obviously going to be a particularly deadly day and the index should be
        able to capture that. We would like to build into these indices toxicity indicators as
        well so that the index should reflect not just the levels but also whether the cocktail of
        air pollutants is less toxic or more. The toxicity of different air pollutants is
        obviously different. Once we develop this index we would like to implement a smog alert
        for the city in which apart from informing people on a daily basis about the air quality
        in Delhi we would also put pressure on the government to implement pollution emergency
        measures for an immediate local impact.  | 
       
      
         | 
       
      
        3. 
          Develop
        pollution inventory for the city of Delhi  
        We would also like to develop a good inventory of air pollution sources, so that source
        wise contribution and trend in source wise emissions can be estimated and predicted as
        also the health effects thereof. The weakest link in our air quality planning is that it
        is still not possible to arrive at reliable source wise pollution load estimates in the
        city.  | 
       
      
         | 
       
      
        | This workshop brought together experts from all
        over the world with interest and experience in these issues to help us develop
        methodologies to develop air quality index and pollution source inventory for Delhi. | 
       
      
         | 
       
     
     |