|
|
 |
|
 |
|
EPCA's
report on Clean Fuels, which it submitted to the Supreme Court in
early July 2001, argues that no hydrocarbon fuel can be specified
as a "clean fuel" which does not cause pollution or is
not otherwise injurious to health. But instead, it defined a category
of fuels called environmentally acceptable fuels, which could be
promoted in heavily polluted areas like Delhi.
Importantly, the authority made a distinction between fuel standards
and emission norms needed for "hot spots" - extremely
polluted areas. It argued, "Delhi is in an air pollution hot
spot area and requires special approaches to tackle air pollution."
This would set the policy for other cities grappling with severe
pollution as well.
|
|
The
authority then examined different fuels and available emission control
technologies to arrive at a package of alternative, environmentally
acceptable fuels. It said: |
 |
CNG,
LPG and propane can be considered environmentally acceptable
fuels. |
 |
Current
petrol supplied to Delhi contains no lead and low benzene
(less than 1 per cent). But to call it environmentally acceptable,
it is necessary to use catalytic converters for treatment
of exhaust gases, assure adulteration does not take place
and further reduce polluting constituents like sulphur, aromatics
and olefins.
|
 |
ULSD
with 10 ppm sulphur and low polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
(PAH) content will be significantly less polluting provided
it is used in combination with particulate traps and catalytic
converters. It will also be necessary to ensure that ULSD
does not get adulterated. In this case, ULSD can be regarded
as an environmentally acceptable fuel.
|
|
EPCA,
however, did not buckle under pressure to accept LSD as a clean
fuel. Its position was that "LSD is not an environmentally
acceptable fuel since it does not permit effective use of exhaust
treatment devices like particulate traps. Evidently, there is need
for further improvement in the quality of diesel as also of measures
to prevent adulteration."
To take care of inter-state commercial vehicles, moving in
and out of the city, EPCA suggested a way out - temporarily. It
agreed that these vehicles could run on 500 ppm sulphur diesel.
But, the authority underlined that this would be regarded as "transitional
fuel" permitted for a limited period only.
This period should be as short as possible because of adverse
public health effects, it stressed. "A time bound programme
should be drawn up to reduce the sulphur content down to a level
at which exhaust treatment system including particulate traps can
be effectively used. This level will have to be 30 ppm
sulphur or less with controls on PAH content of diesel," said
the authority's report.
|
|
Charting
a clean course |
In
its report, EPCA also laid out an action plan to implement the court
order to convert commercial vehicles by September 30, 2001. Most
importantly, given the truncated governance and lack of accountability,
it named the different agencies that need to be directed to ensure
the effective implementation. It recommended:
|
 |
Provide
an adequate and enhanced allocation of natural gas for Delhi's
transport sector and this allocation should keep pace with the
growing demand.
Agency: MPNG |
 |
Current
infrastructure for CNG distribution should be strengthened and
increased from its total 71 dispensing stations including 38
daughter stations, as on July 2001, to 90 dispensing stations
by December 2001, all consisting of mother/ on-line stations
and daughter-booster stations, with a proper distribution across
the city. IGL should ensure gas pressure of more than 200 bars
in all the CNG stations.
Agency: MPNG and IGL |
 |
Prepare
contingency plans to deal with the eventuality of disruption
in gas supply for buses and a plan of action should be filed
in the Supreme Court.
Agency: MPNG and IGL |
 |
The
deadline of September 30, 2001 for converting all vehicles
should be extended, giving reasonable time for delivery of
chassis and bus bodies. Those who still continue to ply on
diesel beyond that date may be allowed to do so, for a further
period of three months, in the interest of the commuting public,
but should be fined heavily and punitively.
Agency: Delhi Government
|
 |
A
ceiling should be put on the number of tourist permits given
to inter-state vehicles, equivalent to 1.5 times the normal
annual growth rate of this category for the last five years.
Agency: Delhi Government
|
 |
Financial
incentives should be provided to bus operators purchasing
new original equipment manufacturers (OEM) and retrofitted
CNG buses in the form of sales tax and excise tax exemption
and low-interest loans with the subsidies ideally recovered
from enhanced road taxes on private vehicles like cars and
scooters and a tax on a polluting fuel like diesel.
Agency: Union Ministry of Finance, Delhi Government
|
|
|
The
recommendations were not acceptable to the diesel lobby. As BJP
leader and former chief minister of Delhi Madan Lal Khurana put
it, "the recommendations of the Bhure Lal committee on hiking
diesel prices are alarming and unacceptable."
The entire attempt was then to find ways of subverting or undermining
the EPCA report. The petroleum secretary reportedly said in the
meeting convened by the prime minister to discuss the CNG tangle,
that the EPCA report has to be countered. He and his minister, Ram
Naik, then suggested that another committee should be formed, this
time under the chairpersonship of R A Mashelkar, head of CSIR, to
device a "comprehensive" auto-fuel policy. As many newspapers
reported, cynically, "yet another committee".
|
|
The
cleanest among all
|
Emissions
from a CNG bus are much lower than even Euro IV, except for
carbon monoxide (which still meets Euro II norms)
|
|
Year
of Particulate implementation
|
Particulate
Matter
|
Hydrocarbons
matter
|
Nitrogen
oxides
|
Carbon
monoxide
|
Euro
I |
1993
|
0.4
|
1.23
|
9.0
|
4.9
|
Euro
II |
1996
|
0.15
|
1.1
|
7.0
|
4.0
|
Euro
III |
2000
|
0.10
|
0.66
|
5.0
|
2.1
|
Euro
IV |
2005
|
0.02
|
0.46
|
3.5
|
1.50
|
Emissions
from CNG bus of
Ashok Leyland (stoichiometric
engine with a three-way
catalytic converter)
|
0.014
|
0.04
(non methane hydrocarbon)
|
3.14
|
3.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|