Bring the US back to the climate
        conclave 
         
        CSE media briefing insists on finding ways to re-engage the US in climate change
        negotiations and setting up a democratic framework with right incentives and disincentives
        for rich and poor alike 
        
        There should be no talk of commitments by developing
        countries towards mitigating climate change until the negotiators of the Eight Conference
        of Parties (CoP-8) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
        find a way to deal with the worlds biggest polluter, the United States of America.
        According to the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), this is the only way to ensure
        that the world moves towards just economic and environmental governance.  
        In a well-attended CSE media briefing at the India
        Habitat Centre, Lodi Road, New Delhi, on Tuesday a day before the inauguration of the
        CoP-8 in the Capital, Sunita Narain, director, CSE, argued that the success of CoP-8 will
        be largely determined by whether the negotiators succeed in re-engaging the US, the
        worlds heaviest polluter, which is resisting all efforts to take responsibility for
        its enormous emissions and rejecting multilateralism in the global climate change
        negotiations. 
        "The US and all industrialised countries will have
        to begin to put into place policies to reduce their emissions before they can coerce
        developing countries into emission commitments," she said, "It is now payback
        time for industrialised countries, who have all overdrawn on the earths natural
        capital to feed their industrial growth." 
        Anju Sharma, co-ordinator, Global Environment Governance
        Unit, CSE, emphasised that what is urgently needed is "to move from carbon energy to
        renewable energy or the world stands in danger of being locked into carbon for another
        century. The only option left is to transit to a zero-carbon system." She, however,
        cautioned against policy instruments like the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) designed
        by industralised countries under the Kyoto Protocol to aid in this process. 
        "Under the CDM, developed countries can invest in
        clean energy projects in developing countries to help reduce the amount of carbon dioxide
        in the atmosphere. But these are just ploys that puts our atmosphere up for trade and
        profit as these countries only bear the step-up costs towards clean technology and not the
        actual costs and even claim trading credits for it" 
        In the Delhi Declaration, India and the developing
        countries should insist "all technology transfer from the North to the South be in
        frontline renewable technologies." Otherwise it would mean the use of CDM by
        industrialised countries as a cheap way to meet their targets without making any changes
        to cut down emissions in their own countries, Sharma maintained. 
        Touching on the issue of the use of sinks under CDM (at
        the CoP-7 in Marrakech, it was agreed that industrialised countries could use credits from
        sinks, i.e. land, forests and oceans which absorb carbon dioxide and act as reservoirs,
        towards meeting up to one per cent of their reduction targets), Sharma dismissed it as
        "controversial" and "complex" in terms of procedure. 
        India should take a firm position in CoP-8 to restrict
        such projects to local communities, as sink projects are currently the only means of
        ensuring that poor communities benefit from emissions trading, she added. 
        View CSE's Media Briefing presentation: CoP-8 - History,
        Politics, Issues  |