op.jpg (1569 bytes)

THE CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE

The best way to understand the impact of cancer is not to look at the annual incidence rate which is about 150 per 1,00,000 people but at the lifetime incidence rate, because cancer is more or less a fatal disease. You normally are not lucky enough to get it more than once. The rural data shows a lifetime incidence of one out of 34-36 men and one out of 18-20 women get cancer. But the urban data for the worst city-Delhi -is one out of 13-14 men and one out of nine-10 women followed closely by Chennai. In other words, cities are more cancer-prone than rural areas and that in the early 1990s, we could have expected one out of 10-15 urban Indians to get cancer in their lifetime -that is, every second or third family would have to face a health emergency at some time or the other. When compared to Western countries which have a lifetime incidence of one out of four-six persons, the Indian data looks good, but do not worry, we are catching up with them. The Government’s data relies only on hospital data, which makes it inadequate, and probably an underestimate.

My personal experience shows that a city like Delhi is probably already matching the Western world. The Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), an environmental NGO, which I head, has had 35 members on its board of directors coming from Delhi in the last 20 years of its existence. Of these 35, six have had cancer and three are already dead, which gives a lifetime incidence rate as high as one out of six: the prevailing situation in the West. The situation with respect to blood cancers like lymphomas and leukaemias is worse in Delhi. Though the overall cancer incidence is higher in women, it is higher in men in the case of blood cancers. The average incidence of blood cancers in men of Delhi is about four times more than in the rural areas for which data is available, twice that in Bhopal, and nearly 50 percent more than in Chennai, Mumbai and Bangalore. Even in the case of women, Delhi tops the list leaving the other cities way behind. Of the six directors of CSE who have had cancer, exactly half have had blood cancers of which two were diagnosed while in their forties. "Young" Kumaramangalam getting leukaemia in his forties will only surprise our politicians. And like Kumaramangalam, of the three CSE directors who had the misfortune to suffer from blood cancers, two have already passed away.

I am the only one alive even though I had such a rare lymphoma-in my eyes, brain and the spinal cord -that there were in the early 1990s not even 200 medically recorded cases of this specific version of the disease. Not one doctor in India- and I sought help from the best of the best could even diagnose the disease. I survived only because I was able to find medical researchers in the U.S. who were trying to develop a treatment for such a rare disease. Isn’t it amazing that there are scientists in this world who are trying to find answers to medical problems that have not even affected 200 people even while our own boffins are still struggling with diseases that affect millions! But tell that to our science braggarts who want to send a man to the moon to "prove" India’s third-rate prowess in science.

So that does this tell us? First, that Delhi is a hotbed of blood cancers. Mr V.P.Singh and P.R.Kumaramangalam are just the more- well known victims. Second, that cancer treatment is still very poor in India.

But, despite these facts, try looking for a study by India’s medical community trying to find out why Delhi is so bad for blood cancer, so that preventive action could be taken. You will come up with a blank even though there could be reasons galore. One is just forced to wonder all the time. Is it because of the high levels of benzene in Delhi’s air-partly because of the high benzene and aromatic content in our government -produced petrol and partly because of the large numbers of two -stroke two-wheelers, which run without catalytic converters? Benzene is known to cause leukaemias. Or is it because people living in Delhi are exposed to high levels of pesticides in their food? Studies have shown that people in Delhi had extremely high levels of DDT in their body fat about a decade ago, which shows that they are exposed to pesticides can not only cause cancer themselves but also act as immunosuppressants which means they turn down the body’s own ability to fight cancer.

 

CONTINUE>>

BACK>>