PRESS RELEASE OF 13th MAY 1997 
                   
                Stop misinformation and come out with truth 
                CSE sends legal notice to water supply body In response to
                the charges of spreading myths leveled by the Delhi Water Supply and Sewage Disposal
                Undertaking (DWSSDU), Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) had sent a legal
                notice to DWSSDU to be more responsible towards the citizens of Delhi by providing correct
                information while demonstrating the authenticity of the same. CSE had asked DWSSDU to
                withdraw the statements that cast aspersions on CSE and to issue an apology. Since DWSSDU
                has not found it fit to reply to the legal notice and its reminder, CSE has no option but
                to go ahead with appropriate legal measures. 
                It may be recalled that following the release of CSE's report Homicide
                by Pesticide: What pollution does to your body at a well attended public meeting in
                Delhi by former Prime Minister Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee, DWSSDU officials had said in
                public statements that "I do not know what is the motive behind publicising such
                reports which create myths amongst the educated class....why create myths?....it was
                outrageous to suggest that water was not treated for pesticide residue...." It is
                worth noting that Justice P.N. Bhagawati, former Chief Justice of Supreme Court of India
                and Prof. Ramalingaswamy, former director general of Indian Council of Medical Research
                were some other speakers at the public meeting in Delhi, all lauding the CSEs
                report. The Delhi Chief Minister too had said in the assembly that Delhi water is potable.
                 
                Instead of addressing the vital issues affecting the health of the
                people, as raised in the report, unfortunately, the water supply body had chosen to make
                unfounded claims that "We have taken both raw and treated water. Both Samples have
                been checked for pesticides and they are not present" based on just one time sampling
                of one day. 
                As against this, the 1996 studies of Central Pollution Control Board
                (CPCB), which along with the Indo Dutch Government study of 1996 formed the basis of CSE's
                report, were a result of ten years of monitoring of quality of Yamuna waters at fifteen
                places all along the stretch of Yamuna river. There are a number of other studies
                including those by Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Delhi University, Central
                Fisheries Research Institute,(all these we have quoted) World Wide Fund for Nature, etc.
                which all collaborate to CSE's report. Even CPCB has filed an affidavit in Delhi High
                Court which accepts that due to the pollution of Yamuna waters from various sources, the
                health of people including citizens of Delhi and Agra who use it as drinking water source
                is at risk. The DWSSDU, negating these government and non-government research reports,
                however, claimed that none of these theories are proved. "Our samples are chemical
                and pesticide-free".  
                If the DWSSDU was interested in clearing the air, or as in this case,
                the water, they will have to prove that all these studies were faulty. And besides what
                were the DWSSDU doing when these reports were published. Surely a responsible water supply
                agency would be in the know of any report that concerns their main source of water, the
                Yamuna. In any case it is evident that DWSSDU had not been monitoring the pesticides
                levels in the drinking water supplied to Delhi. DWSSDU does not have the capability of
                treating or testing pesticide traces in water. And there is clearly total lack of
                coordination between the various department concerned in this case, including the
                Environment, the health, the agriculture and the water supply department.  
                These are most irresponsible statements, coming as they do come from a
                body whose statutory duty under section 213 of the DMC Act of 1957 (read with Section 511A
                thereof) it is "... for ascertaining sufficiency and wholesomeness of water supplies
                within Delhi" and also to provide accurate information to the citizens of Delhi about
                the quality of water supplies. DWSSDU has gravely erred in the process of spreading
                misinformation instead of addressing the serious issues raised by CSE. 
                      |