CSE’s logo incorporates leaves of five important survival trees in India: Mahua, Khejdi, Alder, Palmyra and Oak
About our logo

health_banner.jpg


     

May-June 2005
download.gif (450 bytes)

 

news_home.jpg
editorial1.gif
lead_story.jpg
new_research.gif (904 bytes)
briefs.jpg
book_review.jpg
campaign.jpg
letters.jpg
news_arcive.jpg
health_home.jpg
cse_home.jpg
BRIEFS

Chemical homes
A us report on household dust reveals that harmful chemicals leach from everyday products assumed innocuous. Young children are particularly at risk, yet the chemicals are legal. The industry seems to be fobbing off these chemicals on people only for profits, alleges the report released recently.

Called Sick of Dust: Chemicals in Common Products — A Needless Health Risk in Our Homes , the report is based on a study conducted by Clean production action (cpa), a us based non-governmental organisation (ngo) along with other ngos.

Dust samples were collected from vacuum bags in 10 homes in each of the seven states studied, California, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, New York, Oregon and Washington. One composite sample was made from the 10 samples collected from each state. Each sample was then tested for the presence of 44 toxic chemicals belonging to six categories and found in common household products such as detergents, cosmetics and toys (see Table: Living with poisons). The results showed that 35 of the 44 chemicals were present in at least one sample. "The study is a reliable evaluation of what is in the dust. But it does not tell us how much of these materials are inhaled," comments Peter Orris, director, Occupational health services institute, University of Illinois at Chicago, usa. However, even small amounts of these chemicals inhaled or ingested may prove harmful.

Lack of rules
The adverse effects of several commonly used chemicals have been documented decades ago. For example, it was known as early as 1975 that fumes from hot pans coated with teflon can kill pet birds. Why are these toxic substances still in circulation? Because of lack of legislation, says the report. As per the us toxics substance control act, the chemicals that have been marketed prior to 1979 are considered safe until proven otherwise. But these make up for more than 99 per cent of the commonly used chemicals.

Living with poisons

Alkylphenols
(5.6 per cent)
Detergents, hair colours, paints, agricultural chemicals, stain removers, adhesives, all-purpose cleaners Can affect sperm production in mammals; may disrupt the human immune system
Organotins
(0.13 per cent)
Additive in vinyl products, wood coatings, diaper cov-ers, cellophane wraps, dishwashing sponges Hormone disruptors. Animal studies show exposure affects brain development
Perfluorinated Organics (0.10 per cent) Used to make Teflon, water and stain resistant materi-als for nonstick frying pan s, utensils, stove hoods, stain-proof carpets, shampoos Known to damage organ function and sexu-al development in lab animals; potentiallycarcinogenic
Pesticides (2.6 per cent) Applied to textiles, added to soap and household cleaning products, paints, wallpapers, insecticides Associated with cancer, reproductive and birth defects; several are neurotoxic
Phthalates (89.6 per cent) Used in vinyl products such as shower curtains, rain-coats, toys, personal care products (perfume, nail pol-ish) enteric coatings of some medications Disrupt reproductive systems in animal studies; can contribute to male infertility; linked to respiratory problems in children
Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (1.9 per cent) Applied to textiles, plastics and electrical goods such as TVs to slow down the spread of fire Mimic thyroid hormones; can retard the nervous and behavioural systems in ani-mals
Source: Sick of Dust: Chemicals in Common Products — A Needless Risk in Our Homes, Clean Production Action, New

"Manufacturers and retailers need to stop using toxic chemicals which are building up in our bodies and switch to safer alternatives which are readily available," says Beverley Thorpe, International Director of cpa. Safer alternatives are available for most, if not all, chemicals. But the Consumer product safety commission that regulates products "has a dismal record of considering chronic long-term health effects resulting from exposure to chemicals from products. They are more focused on injuries and acute poisonings," says Ted Schettler, science director of the us -based ngo, Science and environmental health network.

cpa suggests an overhaul of regulations on chemicals using Europe as an example. Europe’s new draft chemicals management programme, entitled registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemicals (reach), is set for enactment in a year or two. reach would require industry to publicly provide basic health, safety and environmental impact data on all chemicals, both new and old. Industry also will partly pay for reach through registration fees.

According to the European Commission, reach would save an estimated 50 billion Euros in health benefits over the next 30 years and prevent as many as 4,300 cases of cancer.

However, instead of endorsing reach, the American chemistry council (acc) and the Bush Administration are lobbying against it, alleges the report. Because of reach, acc predicts billions of dollars will be lost in us sales of these chemicals to Europe. Obviously, for the us government, monetary profits seem to be a bigger concern than health.

DTE, April 30, 2005

Cheaper option to detect cervical cancer
Researchers from the Tata memorial centre (tmc), Mumbai and the International agency for research on cancer, Lyon (France) have found a cheap substitute for a popular but expensive method to detect cervical cancer. They say a combination of two tests visual inspection with acetic acid (via) and visual inspection with Lugol’s iodine (vili) costs a fraction of the commonly used human papilloma virus (hpv) test but works as well. The hpv test costs at least Rs 350 (subsidised rate at tmc) while via and vili together cost Rs 35 per person screened.

The cost is important because of the 470,000 cervical cancer cases reported worldwide every year. Of the total cases reported about 80 per cent occur in the developing world, where people cannot afford expensive medication. In India, of the 126,000 new cases reported yearly, about 71,000 women die. A cheap diagnostic method would enable screening of entire populations and increase the chances of survival through early detection.

The scientists compared five methods of screening for cervical cancer. Besides hpv, via and vili, the two other methods studied were cytology and the visual inspection with acetic acid using low-level magnification, or viam. All the five tests were conducted on 4,039 women between 35-60 years of age, chosen from two slums in Mumbai. The researchers found that using a combination of via and vili proved to be highly sensitive and could be used for screening the population. The positive cases could then be verified using the standard pap smears. "As this removed the need to test the whole population using the more expensive method, the cost of screening comes down," says Surendra S Shastri of tmc.

On the basis of these results, tmc is currently carrying out a population-based cancer screening in two districts — Ratnagiri and Sindhu Durg — of Maharashtra.

DTE, April 30, 2005

Over wood as cooking fuel
if people in Africa were to switch to charcoal as a cooking fuel from wood, it would not only significantly reduce greenhouse gas (ghg) emissions but also save millions of lives, claim researchers. Led by Dan Kammen of the University of California, Berkeley, the scientists calculated the health and environmental effects of moving to new fuel-use and land-management strategies either gradually (over the next 50 years) or rapidly (within 10 to 15 years).

cooking fuelThe study suggests if current trends in fuel use in sub-Saharan Africa continue, the number of premature deaths among women and young children exposed to wood smoke from stoves will reach nearly 10 million by 2030, from about 400,000 in the year 2000. What’s more, "cooking fires will pump 6.7 billion tonnes of carbon into the atmosphere as ghg in the next 45 years", they say.

Although charcoal is the leading urban fuel in Africa and releases less indoor particulate matter when burned than wood, its use does not find much support from policymakers or environmentalists.

This is because charcoal is made by covering a stack of wood with dirt and allowing it to smoulder for three to seven days - a process that is inefficient and polluting. On the other hand, charcoal production generates rural employment and so could be a blessing in poor regions.

The researchers’ model predicts that a shift to burning charcoal, combined with sustainable forest management and more efficient charcoal-production technologies, would avert some three million premature deaths and reduce ghg emissions by 65 per cent if implemented rapidly. Even if adopted gradually over 50 years, the move would delay one million deaths and cut ghg emissions by 45 per cent, relative to simply carrying on as usual.

Plastics are a health hazard
"Most plastics used in cars emit toxic chemicals not only during their production but also later, potentially exposing users to unhealthy emissions inside their automobile. This is in spite of the fact that safer, less toxic plastics are readily available in the market," says a recent report by a Michigan-based non-profit organisation, Ecology Center, in collaboration with New York-based Clean Product Action (CPA).

The report graded top-selling automakers in the us according to their commitment to use environment-friendly plastics. The us automakers such as Ford and General Motors received "failing grades". Japanese companies such as Toyota were better off. "Though Toyota has implemented many practices that us automakers can learn from, it received a c grade which means there is still a lot of room for improvement," said Charles Griffith of the Ecology Center.

Plastics make up about 7.5 per cent of a car’s weight. This represents almost two million tonnes of plastic waste generated per year in the us alone. Petrochemical-based plastics such as polyvinyl chloride, or pvc , release toxic chemicals throughout their lifecycle: during production (dioxin, furans); during vehicle use (phthalates) and at the time of vehicle incineration (dioxin, hydrochloric acid). Perhaps today’s automakers should follow the example of Henry Ford who produced an entire car body from soybean-based plastics in 1930!

DTE, April 30, 2005

Next Page  Next Page1 2

Past Briefs

email.gif
 

 

POTENTIAL FATHERS BEWARE | HELLO...ANYONE LISTENING?|FAT BRAINS | PCB'S INCRIMINATED