logo.gif (3566 bytes)

Press Releases

AIR POLLUTION arrow.jpg (574 bytes) CLIMATE CHANGE arrow.jpg (574 bytes) ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION arrow.jpg (574 bytes) GREEN RATING arrow.jpg (574 bytes) GLOBAL ENV.GOVERNANCE arrow.jpg (574 bytes) HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT arrow.jpg (574 bytes) MEDIA RESOURCE CENTRE arrow.jpg (574 bytes) POLLUTION MONITORING  LAB arrow.jpg (574 bytes) RAINWATER HARVESTING


  2003.gif

  2002.gif (318 bytes)

  2001.gif

  2000.gif

  1999.gif
  1998.gif
  1997.gif

  Press Releases
  CSE Home


Current Press Release

February 13, 2003


WILLFUL POISONING?

Packaged drinking water manufactured in India is ‘safe’ as it meets guidelines of the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) and the World Health Organisation (WHO), say government officials. The illogic is frightening and ominous. Both sets of norms are inadequate – a sad prognosis for public health.

New Delhi, February 14, 2003: Indians are now condemned to drink unsafe and contaminated water in the name of good health and progress. A technical seminar of "scientists", convened on February 13 by the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), declared bottled water manufactured and sold in the country to be ‘safe for human consumption’ while dismissing the need for more stringent norms for drinking water as "impractical and expensive".

In a sudden volte face, the BIS has retracted from its earlier decision to revise its present "non existent" norms and weak methodology for detecting pesticide residues, arguing that it has decided to amend the norms only in accordance with World Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines. This decision is scary, to say the least, as WHO guidelines are as inadequate as the BIS ones.

As the CSE study "Pesticides in Bottled Water" explained, BIS norms for pesticide residues in bottled water say that pesticides should be "below detectable limits", meaning that they could be present but should escape detection. The methodology it specifies to detect pesticides is such that they would be detected only when present in high levels.

WHO has guidelines for only five of the 20 pesticides tested in bottled water. It is completely silent on norms for deadly pesticides like chlorpyrifos, endosulphan, phosphamidon and malathion. In fact, WHO has no guidelines for organophosphate pesticides.

The BIS current position that it will upgrade standards in accordance with WHO guidelines is a clear indication that public health has been mortgaged under pressure from the industry.

A recent issue of the internationally acclaimed scientific journal Environment Health Perspectives (Volume 111, Number 2, February 2003) has published a study by the Columbia University Center for Children’s Environmental Health. The study clearly holds the organophosphate pesticide chlorpyrifos responsible for reduced birth weight and head circumference in minority populations — even at extremely low exposure.

CSE wishes to express deep concern over the slackening of norms for packaged bottled water. CSE does not insist on European norms but is extremely keen that stringent and quantified norms be set based on acceptable risks. CSE used the European drinking water norms as the benchmark in its study as they are the only quantifiable norms for the range of pesticides used in the country. We wish to highlight the fact that EEC bottled water norms, which will be notified in 2003, are likely to be stricter than those for drinking water that we have followed.

For further details, contact:
Souparno Banerjee at 9810098142

 


Copyright © 2003 Centre for Science and Environment