DOWN TO EARTH | CSE HOME  

 


PESTICIDES IN BOTTLED WATER & SOFT DRINKS: CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS

In February, we released a study on pesticide residues in bottled water. We received a large number of letters, e-mails and messages from across the country asking us, if what we had found in bottled water was correct, then what about soft drinks? 

Tests carried out by CSE's Pollution Monitoring Laboratory found deadly insecticides in 12 leading brands of cold drinks. The CSE exposé has generated tremendous media and public interest. Here is a day-to-day update on media coverage, government reactions and industry response

October 21, 2003

The Tribune, The Financial Express and The Statesman report the JPC’s meeting with representatives of FICCI, CII and ASSOCHAM. The reiterated the industry’s plea to adopt national norms based on Indian conditions and ground realities instead of EU norms. They said EU norms were impractical and would affect the domestic agriculture, food industry and exports. Sharad Pawar said even though they were open to hearing the two cola companies they had not expressed any wish to depose before the JPC. HE also said that they would be visiting the Mysore and Kolkata laboratories and the Coca-Cola plant in Plachimada where a popular agitation is going on against the over use ground water. The JPC has also decided to ask the Union health minister Sushma Swaraj to depose before it.

October 20, 2003

JPC today questioned the government accredited laboratories, CFTRI and CFL as to why pesticide residues were not detected in soft drinks before the CSE published its report, whereas the labs found pesticides in the samples sent by the health ministry. Officials of the two labs told the JPC that they were not the same samples as that tested by CSE. JPC Chair, Sharad Pawar, told The Free Press Journal, Deccan Chronicle, The Indian Express and Deccan Herald that it had the option of calling CSE again for further clarifications. JPC will also see what powers it had to act against the advertisements of the soft drinks claiming they were safe, even though the JPC was looking into the issue. It may also visit the bottling plants of both Coca-Cola and Pepsi, from where samples maybe taken and tested independently before the verdict is given.

October 20, 2003

According to coverage in The Pioneer, the Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore (CFTRI), and the Central Food Laboratory, Kolkata (CFL), have said there is no reason to doubt the methodology used by CSE to detect pesticides. The two labs told the JPC that the CSE had used standard methodology to detect pesticide residues.

October 16, 2003

Coca-Cola told the US regulator Securities Exchange Commission that the allegations of pesticide residues in its soft drinks by CSE were false, the Business Standard reported. It however admitted that the allegations had adversely affected its sales in July-September. In addition, poor demand in Japan caused Asia sales to grow only by one per cent as compare to 9 per cent in the corresponding quarter of last year.

October 10, 2003

CSE deposes before the Joint Parliamentary Committee, which was widely covered by Business Standard, The Indian Express, Deccan Herald. In its presentation, CSE said that in addition to pesticides in soft drinks, their dangerous levels in food and water is an area of concern. The bottled water used in the soft drinks was not regulated and there was a need for a stringent policy for the safe use of pesticides. CSE Director Sunita Narain suggested prescribing different standards for nutritional products like milk and fruit juices and non-nutritional products like soft drinks. Chairman Sharad Pawar said that the CSE presentation was ‘impressive’, but the veracity of the report has to be analyzed by experts. He also said that the JPC had requested the Lok Sabha Speaker for three experts, as the reports were too technical. The JPC also expressed doubts over the report being tabled in the winter session.

October 9, 2003

Representatives of the Ministries of health, food processing, the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) and the Agriculture and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority deposed before the JPC, according to coverage in Business Line and The Hindu. The Health ministry was queried on the reason for issuing draft pesticide residue norms for packaged beverages and whether the ministry had consulted World Health Organization and Codex norms. JPC Chair Sharad Pawar was quoted as saying that the health ministry had not consulted any of the advisory groups that it should have before issuing the draft notification. He also said that food processing ministry and the APEDA said that EU norms applied in India would affect the farmers and the food processing industry. They said a large number of units in the country will not be able to meet the stringent norms and this will also affect the exports of processed food products. Meanwhile the health ministry has deferred its notification on revised norms for pesticides residues till the end of December.

October 3, 2003

Union minister for food processing N T Shanmuhgam goes on another inspection of a bottler, Varun beverages, in Koshi Kalan, Uttar Pradesh. Two bottles of Pepsi manufactured in 1995 and 1996 are seized as they do not have the declaration contains no fruit juice, violating the Fruit Products Order 1955, an article in The Financial Express reports.

October 1, 2003

According to reports in Central Chronicle and Business Line, the Delhi high court stayed the government notification requiring companies to print their manufacturing date, best before date, and contains no fruit declaration on the body of the glass bottles than on the caps. Hindustan Coca-Cola beverages, along with its bottlers and shareholders, had petitioned the high court seeking to refrain the authorities from taking steps to compel them to destroy the existing stocks of empty bottles, pleading for more time to phase out the old stock.

Meanwhile, an article Business Line reports that the beverage industry has started a misinformation campaign claiming that the draft notification of the health ministry, which applies EU norms for water on finished products, will have several implications, and that most products in India will not be able to meet these tough standards. The Cola majors also claim that these standards will be tough to follow and legalizing them in India would be unprecedented and counter to international norms.

September 30, 2003

The Indian Express and the New Indian Express reported that many shops in Chennai were selling bottles of soft drinks that had long crossed the best before use date by offering huge discounts. The two litre bottles, which normally cost Rs 40 were being sold for Rs 15 and even below. Meanwhile, Business Standard reports Pepsi Co claims that the consumer confidence is returning, with sales returning to pre-controversy levels. Media reports say that sales fallen 30 per cent after the CSE report.

September 22, 2003

The Delhi High Court deferred the hearing on the petition filed by PepsiCo India challenging CSE’s report that soft drinks had pesticide residues, according to a Business Line article. The hearing has been deferred till October 28 as both Pepsi and CSE wanted more time to file their replies.

September 21, 2003

The Hindu reports Union minister of state for food processing inspected the various sections of the Pepsi soft drinks plant at Mamandoor in Kancheepuram district for nearly two hours. He said he had taken samples of various Pepsi drinks and sent them for testing at Chennai and Mysore laboratories.

September 19, 2003

According to The Financial Express, the government is planning to get an independent evaluation of Coke and Pepsi plants in the vicinity of the Yamuna River in Delhi to check if these units are causing any adverse environmental impact. The issue was discussed with the companies after it was alleged that sludge from plants in Kerala had toxins that could affect human health.

September 17, 2003

The Delhi High Court has stayed the government’s decision to destroy empty glass bottles of Coca-Cola not having the mandatory embossed declaration "sweetened aerated water, contains no fruit juice". According to The Economic Times, the court issued notice to the ministry of food processing industries to reply to the company’s allegations that government’s direction to destroy empty glass bottles lying segregated in various plants in the country is illegal.

September 16, 2003

The Indian Express, The Asian Age, Business Standard covered the first meeting of the Joint Parliamentary Committee. The JPC decided to involve experts to study the issue and invited suggestions from NGOs, industry representatives, farmers, medical professionals, and toxicologists and any other interested party. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research chief Dr R A Mashelkar made a presentation to the JPC giving an overview of the issue. The JPC members also witnessed the presentations of the scientists from the CFTRI and the CFL. Speaking to reporters, the chairman of the JPC said that it would request the Speaker formally for three experts: G Thyagarajan, N K Agnihotri, and S K Khanna. The next meeting was scheduled for October 9. The committee members also raised objections to the health ministry draft notification, which had set stringent standards for fruit juices and cost drinks. The committee said that the health ministry notification be kept aside till the JPC had formulated its own view on the issue.

September 15, 2003

The government is planning to make statutory warning mandatory for all soft drinks producers. An article in The Economic Times reports that the warning will have information on caffeine and number of calories the drink carries. Diet Coke and Pepsi will have a warning that it is not safe for children. According to the ministry for food processing, the draft notification is ready.

September 12, 2003

Avtar Singh Bhadhana, a Lok Sabha MP and a member of the Joint Parliamentary Committee, has served a legal notice to the Coca-Cola and Pepsi offices in India and their headquarters. He has asked them to immediately stop their sales in India or else face a $10 billion suit on grounds of causing health hazards.

September 10, 2003

A Deccan Chronicle report says that the Andhra Pradesh government under pressure from the cola giants, has moderated its pace on laboratory tests of soft drinks samples collected from various parts of the state. It has directed the Institute of Preventive Medicine to collect samples of soft drinks of both Coca-Cola and Pepsi and test them for chemical, biological, bacteriological and pesticide residues. But the tests are yet to start even a month after the samples had been collected.

September 5, 2003

The Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) raided a Delhi plant of bottled water that was picking up bottles of branded water, filling them with water and selling them under fake ISI mark of quality. Although fake bottling plants were previously reported, in Kanpur and Pun, BIS is only now realizing how widespread the problem is. According to The Times of India, Union food and consumer affairs minister Sharad Yadav ordered the BIS to conduct raids in various parts of the country to prevent further misuse

Meanwhile, Business Line reports that Coca-Cola in a press release said that the Gujarat government has cleared 17 samples of Coca-Cola taken from various parts of the state, after they tested negative for pesticides like Lindane, Chlorpyrifos, and DDT. The samples were tested at the Food and Drugs Laboratory in Vadodara.

September 4, 2003

Maharashtra Food And Drug Administration has decided to forward its report on tests conducted on soft drinks to determine pesticide residues to the Joint Parliamentary Committee, The Free Press Journal reported. The minister Anil Deshmukh said that the results had been received and they show variable percentage of pesticide residues in the products, with Pepsi containing Lindane above global norms.

Meanwhile, Kolkata mayor Subrata Mukherjee will sue the Diamond Beverages for publishing the Kolkata Municipal Corporation report clearing the soft drinks samples tested by it, The Statesman reports. Under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act 1956, the test report of any beverage or food cannot be published by the authority against which charges are brought.

September 3, 2003

Newstime reports that samples of Coca-Cola and Pepsi tested at the Vimta laboratory had pesticides below detectable limits, according to the Hyderabad-based Medically Aware and Responsible Citizens of Hyderabad (MARCH). Its chairman, Dr Bhargava, however, also said that 75-100 samples tested across the country by NGOs and the Union government were enough to order the two soft drinks majors to pack their bags.

With the norms for bottled water becoming effective from January 1, 2004, all food testing laboratories will also have to upgrade their testing facilities to meet European standards on bottled water and beverages. Laboratory officials are expecting a rise in their costs that can go up to crores or rupees. The 34 food testing laboratories under the ministry of science and technology and accredited to the National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories will have to upgrade, according to The Statesman.

September 1, 2003

An article in The Telegraph reports on the cracks in the unity between the two soft drinks majors. The Delhi high court restrained Coca-Cola from airing its ad campaign featuring Salman Khan, saying they were intended to depict Pepsi as inferior. The court however refused to admit Pepsi’s plea that the use of an object similar to its logo in the Coca-Cola ad amounted to an infringement of the trademark and copyright law.

Coke and Pepsi officials were called by the West Bengal Environment Ministry, The Statesman reported. Environment minister Manab Mukherjee informed the chief minister that he was not satisfied by the responses of the companies on the presence of lead and cadmium in the sludge collected from a bottling plant at Diamond Harbour Road. The companies had been given 10 days time to clarify, but their reply was not satisfactory.

AUGUST 30, 2003

According to reports in The Financial Express, The Pioneer, The Assam Tribune, and The Times of India, the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare has issued a draft amendment notification of the Prevention of Food Adulteration rules of 1955, dated August 26, to regulate the presence of metals, and pesticides in beverages, fish and other food products. It proposes to extend the norms for pesticide residues in bottled water to all kinds of beverages including soft drinks. 30 days have been given for objections or suggestion before a confirmatory is issued.

Meanwhile, reports in The Tribune, The New Indian Express, The Hindu note that the Central Science Laboratory in Britain has found soft drinks safe for human consumption after testing two bottles each of Coca-Cola and Pepsi. The lab said that out of the 35 pesticides tested, it did not find traces of 31 at or above the EU norms. The tests were commissioned by the newsmagazine Outlook, which picked up samples from the Safdarjung Enclave area of South Delhi. Coca-Coal India claimed that it had got a clean chit from the laboratory.

In another development, The Statesman reports that the green bench of the Kolkata high court heard two separate petitions for banning the sales of the soft drinks. One of the petitioners, Subhas Dutta said that the ingredients of these soft drinks namely caffeine, phosphorus, and excess sugar were hazardous and were not known to the consumers. The court has directed its office to issue notices to the respondents.

AUGUST 29, 2003

The green bench of the Kolkata High Court admitted a public interest litigation to demanding the state pollution control board to make public test results of the soft drinks samples analyzed for toxins. Both the board and the environment minister had said that their reports would not be disclosed, but sent to the Centre and the state health department.

AUGUST 28, 2003

Hindustan Times reports that the test results of the Central Food Technological Research Institute (CFTRI), Mysore, and the Central Food Laboratory (CFL), Kolkata were made public. The tests revealed that the samples of both Coke and Pepsi contained levels of pesticides like Lindane and DDT that were higher than permissible EU norms. DDT was 12 times higher than the EU norms in 58 per cent of the samples. Lindane was found in all the samples and was higher than EU norms in 33 per cent of the samples. Chlorpyrifos was also found in all the samples and exceeded EU norms in 75 per cent samples. Blue Pepsi had pesticide residues 5.2 times higher than the EU standards, the highest levels in all samples of all brands. While Pepsi, Diet Pepsi and Limca cleared the EU bar. The labs in a joint report also said that since the samples tested by them were not from the same batch as CSE samples, the two reports were not comparable.

AUGUST 27, 2003

The Financial Express reports that the Union Ministry for Health and Family Welfare have decided to promulgate an ordinance to categorise water as a food item and fix enforceable safety standards for drinking water under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act. The proposal will be put before the Union cabinet for approval. This will mean that all agencies responsible for providing drinking water will have to adhere to these norms. Health Minister Sushma Swaraj also said that the detailed reports of the test results of the 12 brands of soft drinks would be made public tomorrow.

Meanwhile in Rajasthan, a petitioner has challenged the test results of the samples tested by the State Central Public Health Laboratory, Jaipur, which shows no microbial contamination.

AUGUST 27, 2003

The Nepal government announced that the Coca-Cola and Pepsi samples tested for pesticide residues are within safety levels for consumption, the Kathmandu Post reported.

AUGUST 25, 2003

The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare seeks an "unconditional apology" from Pepsi, after the company used the Health minister Sushma Swaraj’s name in an advertisement claiming that the minister had given a clean to Pepsi. The advertisement had quoted the minister as saying "all these (soft drinks) are well within safety limits".

The Mumbai High Court sets aside an order by the Maharashtra Food and Drugs Administration prohibiting the sales and purchase of a batch of soft drinks from the Pune plant of Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages, saying that the product confirmed to the standards set by the PFA Rules 1955. This order was issued after the court received the public analyst’s reports of seven samples of Coke, Limca, Thums Up and Sprite, which had pesticide residues below European standards.

AUGUST 25, 2003

A public interest litigation was filed suo moto in the Supreme Court (SC) today on behalf of the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE). The SC issued notices to the Union ministries of Food and Civil Supplies, Health and Environment and Forests. The case will again come up for hearing after four weeks. The genesis of this PIL lay in a letter written by CSE Director, Sunita Narain on February 5, 2003 to key members of the judiciary informing them about the findings of the CSE Lab results on pesticide residues in bottled water that raised serious issues of groundwater and surface water contamination.

The letter was turned into a PIL by Justice Dharmadhikari, who was one of its recipients; the Union of India was made the respondent.

AUGUST 24, 2003

An article in the Financial Express reports on the strange and close collaboration between Coke and Pepsi following the CSE study. The same report adds that in conceding to the JPC, health and family welfare minister Sushma Swaraj will find it difficult to convince the Opposition that Coca-Cola and Pepsi did not offer bribes to clear their name.


AUGUST 23, 2003


According to the Times of India, Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) leader Sharad Pawar will head a 15-member joint parliamentary committee (JPC) to examine whether the recent CSE findings on pesticide residues in soft drinks are correct. The JPC will submit its report by the beginning of winter session.

Meanwhile, doctors and scientists came together at the Centre for Science and Environment office to discuss the impact on an overall pesticide policy in light 1of the government’s apparent ‘clean-chit’ to cola companies. Most agreed that that voluntary norms aren’t enough, and that there was a need to examine the basic structure of standards that at present do not exist in the country.

The Times of India reports that a day after Pepsi took out large advertisements in Delhi newspapers urging consumers to ‘Refresh your faith…. Now, refresh your thirst’, the Maharashtra food and drug administration served a notice on the company saying four samples collected from the Khalapur plant in Raigad district contained high levels of pesticide residues.

August 21, 2003

The Asian Age reports that the humble nimbu paani, or the more upmarket fresh lime soda and ice tea are replacing Coke and Pepsi brands across the country. The report says that outlets in the city have seen a drop in cola sales by more than 50 per cent ever since the CSE report on pesticides in soft drinks came out. Meanwhile, The Hindustan Times has reported Pepsi as having announced that it will use only bottled water for its Fountain Pepsi outlets in India.

According to another report in The Hindustan Times, the Food and Drug Administration, Maharashtra, has seemingly announced that some soft drinks, such as Thums Up and Limca, are clear of pesticides. On the other hand, The Asian Age has reported the Maharashtra government has having defended its decision to raid the Coca-Cola’s bottling plant at Pune, claiming the cola giant does not conduct routine tests for pesticide and insecticide residue.

August 19, 2003

Yet another day of tests and counter-tests. Lab tests conducted by the government of Kerala have apparently not found any traces of pesticides any Coke samples, but the Kerala government has refrained from issuing a clean chit to the multinational for the time being (Financial Express).

Meanwhile, The Asian Age reported that the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) would like to apply European norms for pesticide content in bottled water and soft drinks from next year. However, it is up to the government to make these standards legally binding. The Pioneer, on the other hand, reported that BIS may buy time for things to cool down before deciding on whether soft drinks companies should be asked to adhere to stricter quality norms after the issue was discussed at a meeting on Monday.

In an article titled “Cleaning up at source”, Yoga Rangatia, writing for The Pioneer, hits the nail upon its head by saying that public discourse on the matter has unfortunately veered towards an anti-multinational stance instead of looking at the main issue, that of groundwater contamination.

August 11, 2003

Delhi High Court asks government to set up an expert committee and come up with results of tests in 3 weeks. It also asked the government to review the standards for soft drinks, and include pesticide norms comparable to the rest of the world.

PepsiCo says in court that they will not press charges and allegations made by them in their petition against the CSE report for now. 

August 8, 2003

Pepsi files petition in High Court alleging CSE study was unreliable and motivated, and calling for the establishment of an expert committee to review the pesticide levels. It also seeks a gagging order for CSE, by asking the court not to permit the organisation to publish further material, and remove the information from its website.

Coca-Cola moves Mumbai High Court to quash an order of the state FDA prohibiting the sale of soft drinks manufactured in its Pune plant. 


August 8, 2003

Orissa government orders tests of soft drinks samples by available facilities in the state and ICMR, Kolkata and Ahmedabad. 

Food and Drug Administration, Nagpur, bans distribution of Pepsi and Coke products as a "precautionary measure". The soft drinks were banned from leaving the premises of the bottling plants pending laboratory analysis of the products. Samples were collected and sent to a laboratory in Pune for testing. 

West Bengal health department decides to test samples at the Public Health Laboratory and Salt Lake laboratory of the WBPCB.

Karnataka state government announces intention to test soft drink samples.

Gujarat government also collects samples for testing from plants in Bharauch, Ahmedabad and Rajkot. 

Andhra Pradesh government announces intention to do 'random testing' of soft drinks.
August 7, 2003

Dr SP Vasi Reddy, director, VIMTA Labs, tells the media that he has only received two samples of soft drinks manufactured by PepsiCo for testing in March 2003, but no samples from Coca-Cola. 

August 6, 2003

Health minister Sushma Swaraj announces in Parliament that samples have been collected. Samples of 15 branded soft drinks from Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata and Delhi were subsequently sent for testing to the Central Food Technological Research Institute (CFTRI), Mysore for testing.

August 6, 2003

PepsiCo publishes results of tests carried out by VIMTA Labs, Hyderabad, of samples from plants producing Aquafina, the bottled water manufactured by the company. In one case, pesticide residues in treated water are inexplicably higher than in the untreated water. Tests were carried out only on one bottle of the finished soft drink product.

Data made available by Coca-Cola on the Internet also pertains to Kinley, its bottled water product. 

In both cases, the companies sent samples to the laboratories for testing. This goes against the norms set down by BIS on how samples should be collected (randomly). For credible testing, it is also important that the samples are collected, sealed and sent to the laboratory by an independent external agency, not by the manufacturers themselves. 

August 5, 2003

PepsiCo and Coca-Cola convene a joint press conference, where they attack the credibility of CSE's report, claiming that they get their products tested regularly from VIMTA Labs, Hyderabad, and TNO Nutrition and Food Research Lab, The Netherlands. No report is made immediately available however. The CEO's of both companies insinuated legal action against CSE. 

August 5, 2003

CSE releases a report on pesticide residues found in 12 major cold drink brands sold in and around Delhi. 

The report pointed out that the regulations for soft drinks industry were much weaker, even compared to bottled water. Neither the PFA nor the Fruit Products Order (FPO) - aimed at regulating food standards in India - regulate pesticide levels in soft drinks.

The report pointed out that even more shockingly, there are no standards to define 'clean' or 'potable' water in India. In 1996, a parliamentary committee on subordinate legislation had suggested that water quality should be regulated just as food quality is, but the Ministry of Urban Development opposed the idea, saying this would impose a legal commitment to adhere to standards. Agencies providing water could not adhere to these standards, the ministry claimed, due to lack of financial resources. 

The CSE report called on the government to put in place legally enforceable water quality standards.

July 14, 2003

MOHFW issues the notification for bottled water.

July 9, 2003

BIS holds another meeting to discuss the appropriate testing methodologies to enforce the proposed standards. A choice between USEPA method and Association of Analytical Chemists (AOAC) was agreed on. 

April 7, 2003

The central committee on food standards unanimously decides to recommend EU norms to the health ministry. 

March 25, 2003

Reddy committee report submitted to Sharad Yadav, minister of consumer affairs.

March 14, 2003

Almost 20 bottled water units across the country lose ISI mark.

February 20, 2003

Heath minister, Sushma Swaraj announces notifying new standards by April 1.

February 18, 2003

The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW) issues a draft notification on pesticide residues in bottled water under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act (PFA).
February 9, 2003

Minister for human resource development and science and technology Murli Manohar Joshi write to the Prime Minister, stating that scientists and experts of his department validated the CSE report, and calling for stringent measures. In the letter, Joshi agreed that the BIS standards are "obviously inadequate".

February 8, 2003


BIS convenes a meeting to review the requirement for pesticide standards, and proposes the adoption of the EU norms on bottled water for India.

February 5, 2003

The government set up a high-level investigation to look into the inadequacy of standards for packaged drinking water, headed by Additional Secretary of the Consumer Affairs Department, Satwant Kaur Reddy.

February 4, 2003

CSE released its report on pesticide in bottled drinking water in India. Analysis of 17 brands sold in and around Delhi and 13 brands from the Mumbai region and found 5 different pesticide residues, in levels much higher than the norms prescribed in the European Union for packaged water. 

The report pointed out that EU norms were used because the standards set by the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) were vague and inadequate, merely calling for pesticide levels "below detectable levels" (which will vary, depending on the technology used to detect them).

The report also pointed out that the source for the contamination appeared to be the groundwater used by the companies, which was not treated for pesticides before bottling.


TOP   

message.jpg Feel cheated? Share your outrage... with others

DOWN TO EARTH

R E L A T E D   S T O R I E S

bottles.jpg

Pesticides in bottled  water...more>>
pumping.jpg (3069 bytes)
Pumping out poisons Arsenic, fluoride in drinking water...more>>
poisons.jpg
   How industry poisons India's groundwater

...more>>

drink.jpg (2048 bytes)
  A drink too much
Delhi's groundwater is poison

...more>>